Balancing technology with humanity

At the recently concluded HIMSS25, the annual conference of the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, AI was the clear trend of the year. HIMSS President Harold Wolf joked in his opening remarks that he challenged attendees to find ten booths that didn’t mention AI. After walking the floor, it was clear this was an apt assessment.

If you looked carefully though, there was an interesting counterbalance to this evolution in healthcare technology—the need to maintain the human touch in the care experience. The keynote address, “Shaping the Future of Healthcare: A Collaborative Care Journey Where Technology and Humanity Coexist,” seemed poised to address this, but mostly skirted around the edges—although pediatric care robots Lumi and Nova did raise interesting questions about what constitutes a “personal touch.” A later session, “From Data to Dialogue: Transforming Charts into Patient-Provider Relationships,” really delved into the theme fully. The speakers started by taking us back to the early days of family physicians who ushered you from cradle to grave, before pondering how AI can help foster a similar relationship in today’s complex health system.

It is indisputable that AI has the power to create efficiencies. To streamline workflows. To gather and digest data at an unprecedented rate. But in healthcare, as in so many industries, the challenge is how to capitalize on those efficiencies while still creating a warm, welcoming experience.

It is a question of engagement: for clinicians, how to engage meaningfully with their patients. For technology companies, how to engage meaningfully with providers and payers to understand their challenges and enable them to deliver better outcomes for those same patients.

This challenge, this question of how to engage meaningfully, is one that brands grapple with every day. And, perhaps ironically, it is a challenge that AI is better equipping us to address. Brands can now learn more about their audiences than ever before. They can conduct social listening, to hear consumers’ own words about a brand and its competitors. They can run predictive models, to map the true causal relationships between variables and understand which attributes drive results. They can build machine learning models that predict marketing and brand ROI.

In all those cases though, AI only provides the foundation. You need human intellect, human empathy, human creativity, to take this information and build meaningful brand interactions. Just as clinicians, and those who partner with and support them, are recognizing that the proper role for AI is in addition to, not in replacement of. And that the way to deliver the best care experience is to keep humanity in the equation.

Avoiding the generative AI trap: Why human input still matters

Our brand consultancy, Tenet Partners, is in the intellectual property business. Clients hire us for our original thinking and creativity—our distinctive expertise, developed over decades of award-winning work for some of the world’s most prestigious brands.

Today, we’re experiencing a new challenge: the rise of artificial intelligence, and in particular the generative AI tools that are taking the world by storm. This powerful technology is disrupting many industries, including ours. As part of our value proposition, we are making a commitment to clients that our work is not being done by AI.

AI is a double-edged sword

Make no mistake: when used properly AI can be enormously useful technology and in fact, our own analytics practice is rooted in predictive AI. There’s a lot of value there, and such tools can make it far faster and easier to uncover trends and create useful insight.

But at the same time, AI can pose a hazard, because it has the potential to diminish the perceived value of human expertise—particularly when generative AI is applied to creative activities such as content development.

AI is a trap that we willingly walk into

As useful as it may be for organizing thoughts and generating content quickly, generative AI can be a trap precisely because it produces good results so easily. Humans crave convenience, and are all too willing to lean on technology in the name of speed and ease. Over-reliance on technology risks erosion of creative, observational, critical thinking and decision-making skills through lack of use.

Does keeping creative skills sharp by exercising them matter? Are humans better when it comes to creativity simply because we are human? Generative AI blurs the lines, because it has the potential to be more than a tool that enhances our productivity. Why take the time and effort to craft thoughtful, compelling content if you can just tell a machine to generate it for you? It’s a legitimate question.

Why keeping it real matters

Relying on human creativity matters for brands because, while AI may deliver impressive content with a few simple prompts, there isn’t real intent or original thought behind it. It’s lacking in, for want of a better term, intellectual and creative nutritional value. The arguably excellent form of AI-generated content can mask an underlying lack of substance and nuance.

Branding is, in essence, storytelling done verbally, visually and experientially. And we are all storytellers. Storytelling is as old as humanity. It’s something we do our whole lives—we tell stories even before we learn to speak. AI simply cannot fully satisfy that deeply human urge to connect with others and share our experiences.

The best stories—the ones that move us—come from within. They resonate because they speak to shared human experiences. And that is precisely why it’s so important to base brands on human creativity.

No bots were harmed in the making of this blog post

As Tenet’s editorial director, verbal communication is my livelihood. Storytelling and the use of language are of great interest to me, as is the process by which great ideas come to life. The Tenet team has a very strong and productive collaborative approach to content creation in which we bounce ideas off of one another and bring different perspectives to the table. It’s a stimulating, engaging, and very human activity.

I am deeply aware of the potential of generative AI, both good and bad, and its impact on my work. As a content creator I know all too well that I, too, can fall into the AI trap. For that reason, I’ve made a personal decision to rely on my own ideation, composition and language skills rather than turn to AI. By fully exercising my abilities, I believe I can keep my mental muscles toned and continue to deliver the quality our clients expect from us. It may be more work, but I am convinced that it’s beneficial in the end.

Ultimately, the decision of when, how, and even if, generative AI should be used in your own organization warrants a deeper discussion and thoughtful assessment of its benefits and pitfalls, both practical and ethical. There may well be instances in which generative AI is the best way to handle a given task, but as the old saying goes, there’s no such thing as a free lunch. It’s a tool like any other, and its proper use is up to the person wielding it.

Headquarters 11 West 42nd Street
Penthouse Floors 31/32
New York, NY 10036
212 329-3030

Boston
Columbus
Kansas City
San Francisco

A hexagon-shaped badge from Clutch, with the text 'Top Branding Company' on top and '2024' on the bottom